Nick, I have never heard of “The Spotless Leopard”. I have never objected to them. I don’t know where, who, or what they do. As it isn’t in the ward I represent I have no interest in their case. I have never mentioned them, ever, in any objection to anything. Martin Booth has portrayed my objection to the "Chomp" burger van as being against "The Spotless Leopard", and it has clearly worked.
The "Chomp" burger van wants to be based under the bedrooms of a block of flats. I suggested a nearby location that wouldn't wake residents up early in the morning, but evidently it isn't to the liking of "Chomp", or Martin.
Martin, this latest post of yours now clearly strays into a quite blatant attempt to misrepresent the truth. I have never heard of "The Spotless Leopard". I have never objected to them. I don't know where, who, or what they do. As it isn't in the ward I represent I have no interest in their case. I have never mentioned them, ever, in any objection to anything.
Yet you have taken my objection to "Chomp" - which I clearly objected to on behalf of residents after "Chomp" set up their noisy burger van early in the morning right under the bedroom windows of children living in Anchor Point social housing - then selectively quoted that objection to "Chomp" and presented it as though I used that quote against a different application by "The Spotless Leopard".
Finally, as I keep pointing out, I suggested a suitable location nearby for "Chomp" that wasn't under the bedrooms of residents' flats. Instead of pursuing this slightly strange grudge against me, why not urge your friends at "Chomp" to put in an application for the spot I suggested?
